Saturday, October 13, 2007

Livin’ in Babylon

On October 7, 1999, Adrianne Clarkson, a well known Canadian journalist, became Governor General of Canada. This is a largely symbolic position and, beyond legal and ceremonial duties as Head of State, the Governor General functions as a kind of model Canadian. So, it was interesting to note that, in the time period between being asked to consider the appointment, and the public announcement of the appointment, she married her partner of 15 years. When asked about her new marital status she mused that her marriage was “short enough to still be interesting and long enough to be respectable”.

An event like this is probably a pretty good indication of the Canadian public’s attitude toward marriage at the end of the last millennium; living together unmarried was not so bad as to disqualify you from consideration for the job of Head of State, but if you wanted to actually get the job you needed to tie the knot. Marriage still mattered, but living together unmarried didn’t matter very much.

Now, I mean no criticism of Madame Clarkson. She was merely a representative Canadian. But this is a reminder that we live, and have always lived, in an evolving society. No ethnic group, church, political party, class or community has a corner on “Canadian values”. Canadian values concerning marriage, family, and everything else, are what they are at any given moment, and every group and individual shares these values to a greater or lesser extent. It’s a bit like being average. Each of us is above average in some things and below average in others, and no one really is, and few really want to be, average.

So, if a given community, a church for example, has a particular view of marriage, it should expect to differ in that way from the surrounding community. It should not be surprised or dismayed to find resistance to its view in the surrounding community, and will certainly not expect its children to gather their marital values, or any other values, from the surrounding culture.

And here we have a biblical principle. When God’s people were living in Babylon they needed to focus on producing godly communities of faith. They were commanded to love Babylon, of course, because God loves Babylon. They were commanded to bless Babylon. But the best way to love and bless Babylon was to become the people God wanted them to be, and to produce communities that could bear a faithful and biblical witness not to become Babylonians.

9 comments:

Unknown said...

Way to go Daneeboi.
Gets pretty complicated though as communities like churches that we might expect to all have the same values often don't so gets confusing for all of us but particularly the young ones and sometimes it is harder to love them than those we deem Babylonians and that is not a good witness to anyone.
Comment?

Suzie Q

Jim Parsons said...

Hi Dan

Nice to see you doing more writing and thinking - your writing is strong and I think you have a book in you. We have spoken about this topic often, and this is the book I would outline (were I you).

Let's do coffee again soon.

Jim

Sharon J said...

Hi Dan,
Good to see this, you are a strong communicator. You also blessed my family many times while you were our pastor. Be encouraged. I think that loving the Babylonians and yet not becoming like them is a huge challenge for us as God's people. The lines of black and white that we would like to try rigidly to live by suddenly find much grey area attached, and that requires much prayerful thought and spirit-led action as we seek to be God's representatives and world changers. Be blessed!

Sarah said...

important to note that as well as a corporate church commitment to Zion, we also have to make individual commitments - every day.
Our society has adopted the customs of Babylon for a lot of reasons, one of them being that it is just easier - easier to live with a boyfriend, save on rent etc instead of risking it all with another wedding, or a first wedding. Easier to fib on taxes instead of coming up with the cash for the actual bill. Easier to pretend everything is fine when it isn't. (*and of course I get that all the above are only easier in the very short term, but sometimes short term is all you can see)
The choice to not live in Babylon is a hard one, but the more we stick together, and allow ourselves to be transparent with one another, the easier it will be.

Ron Lowe said...

Hey Dan
First of all I like the Blog.. It's easy to read and is NOT cluttered..
Love the comment re: The Babylonians... As a baby boomer and getting older.... I find this to be the way to a happer life
Ron

Martha said...

Thanks for including me on your mailing list. I'm still figuring out what a blog is!!!
Regarding our living in Babylon. It seems to me that it was out of their Babylonian experience that the Jews became knit-picking regarding the law and rigid in their practices and beliefs. That's when the going gets rough as we balance the living out of our faith and holding on to the reason and source of our faith.

Mary J said...

Hi Dan
I am so glad to see that the pilgrim's journals are going to continue. Your painful and prayerful journey to this point has hurt, amused, and delighted me, and been hugely valuable. Mindful living isn't easy for any of us. As a "Babylonian" on my way, hopefully, to what God designed and intended for me, it is good for me to be reminded that there is light everywhere. Not that I haven't come to expect it from you.
And I, too, like your blog.
Mary

Tim C said...

I have enjoyed our discussion in the past around this theme. I find the concept of "living in Babylon" very helpful. There is another metaphor that I think is equally relevant and perhaps more current to Jesus and St. Paul; that of Empire (of course both Babylon and Rome were empires). Jesus, with his gospel of the Kingdom of God opposed the Roman Empire. But his concern was the complicity of the religious community with the empire, not so much in terms of personal moral choices (for those he challenged the religious institution alone – and, that, for its rigidity) but in terms of social injustice, oppression of the poor and marginalized. St. Paul, too, challenged the empire as he sought to help Christ followers not only survive in the empire, but to subvert it both politically and morally. Babylon or Rome, both work as effective metaphors to make us think about what it means to live as transformed people called to bring transformation. Thanks for your thoughts and the opportunity to think this stuff through.

Tim

Nathan said...

Nice to see you blogging. I hope you keep up with it.

Of course, it takes discernment to see which practices are essential and which ones aren't. That certain ones seem obvious to us is not always an indication. The early Church seems to have assumed that dietary laws would be an essential difference between Babylon and those called out from it (Acts 15:28-9). They put it on the same level as idolatry and fornication, though we don't hear so much about them now.

Nate