By now, thanks to Richard Dawkins,
Christopher Hitchens and their friends, we all know that religion is the source
of most of the evil in the world. Well, at any rate, the cause of most of the
wars and violence humans have endured. But, like so many of the things we all
know, it isn’t true.
Certainly religion is a factor in some violence.
The Crusades are a handy historical example, as are the Inquisition and witch-hunts.
And 21st Century sectarian struggles fill our TV screens. But even Jihad
may be motivated by factors other than religion, and many conflicts have no
religious roots at all.
Consider the two great wars of the 20th
Century. WWI, with its focus on Germany
and England, was hardly a battle between the Lutherans and Anglicans. And WWII
(Germany and Italy against the rest of us, with Japan seizing the opportunity
to seize an opportunity) is equally hard to characterize as a religious affair.
So, if religion isn’t the main problem, what is?
Well, why did the Persians, Babylonians,
Assyrians and Egyptians spend so much of their time beating up on their neighbours,
seizing their territory, stealing their stuff, and generally killing and
enslaving them? And why did the Greeks, Romans, and Barbarians do the same
things in most of the world they knew? And what about the Brits, French,
Spanish, Dutch (yes, piddly little Holland for heaven’s sake); why did they
wander all over the globe from China to the Americas doing the same things to
everyone they could find? And if it was because they were Christians and the
rest of the world was not, why were they also, at the same time, beating up on
each other?
The truth is, the motives for these
conflicts are obvious; seizing territory, stealing stuff, generally killing and
enslaving people, and of course the fear of being on the receiving end of said
activities. Fear and greed are the central motives in all this violence. But it
takes more than motive. You need an opportunity, an advantage, the perceived
likelihood of success.
It seems to me, throughout the long history
of conquest, you find the masters of advanced technologies beating up on those
who have not yet mastered them. The Bronze Age runs over the Stone Age, the
Iron Age runs over the Bronze, Steel runs over Iron, and the folks with the
Nukes pretty much get their way. The spear, the bow and arrow, the long bow,
the musket, canon, rifle, scope, all enabled one people to dominate another.
The Europeans, for example, had the technology, i.e., the opportunity to create
vast empires. And the did. Even piddly little Holland.
Why do nations rise up and inflict
horrifying violence upon other nations? Because they can. And they can because
they happen to have some folks who’ve figured out how to do things others haven’t.
In other words, they have the best scientists. It’s actually all about Science.
When I was a kid “we” were in an arms race
with the Soviet Union. They were nominal Atheists as we were nominal
Christians, but it wasn’t about that. It was about preserving and advancing our
respective ways of life, i.e., affluence and influence. In short, we each feared
what might happen to us if the other mastered the advanced technologies we had
not yet mastered. The focus was technology, not theology, and the battle fields
were Indochina, Africa, and the Middle East.
In January of 1991 we watched, with shock
and awe, as a US led coalition of 34 countries (including Canada), in an amazing
display of developed technology, made war in the Persian Gulf. We wanted to do
this for lots of reasons, but we did it because we could.
In September of 2001, we watched, with
shock and awe, as a tiny band of terrorists from the Persian Gulf, in an amazing
display of borrowed technology, retaliated in New York. They too had lots of
reasons for wanting to do this, but they did it because they could.
What I’m suggesting here is really quite
simple. Religion is not the problem and Science is not the solution. The
solution, if there is one, lies elsewhere.
Love your enemies , do good to those who hate you,
bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. If someone strikes
you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. If someone takes your cloak, do
not stop him from taking your tunic. Give to everyone who asks you, and if
anyone takes what belongs to you, do not demand it back. Do to others as you
would have them do to you. Luke 6:27-31
What
a concept!
2 comments:
You might be interested in William Cavanaugh's book "The Myth of Religious Violence." I've posted a link to a video of one of his lectures on the topic below
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tb1ZHlSfJk
Nathan
That's a great lecture and I'd recommend it to anyone who's seriously interested in this topic. I'll also check out the book.
Thanks, Nathan.
Post a Comment