I continue to be fascinated by the ongoing battle over the government’s decision to stop threatening us with fines and/or imprisonment if we don’t answer all the questions on the long form census. I would have thought that the idea of replacing “answer these questions or go to jail” with “please and thank you” would be applauded by the vast majority of my fellow citizens. Shows what I know.
As I listen to the debate, however, it seems the participants fall into two basic camps. On one side we have those who simply want the data (statisticians, journalists and academics for the most part). This is by far the more vociferous side, perhaps because these are the people who have the microphone (particularly journalists). On the other side are those who object to being bullied into answering question they consider intrusive, object to seeing their fellow citizens bullied and, perhaps, have concerns about how the data collected will be used.
I am a member of the latter group. In 1996 I refused to completely complete the long form for several reasons, two of which I will mention here. Firstly, I don’t believe our government should be gathering race, ethnicity or religion stats when they can give no assurance as to how this information will be used in future. Secondly, apart from rare exceptions, I don’t believe people should be coerced into answering questions they don’t want to answer.
Of course, many will dismiss my concerns as foolish paranoia. When has any Canadian government ever abused citizens based on race or religion? Have our First Nations people, for example, ever been mistreated in any way? Have Asians ever had their property confiscated or been forcibly relocated, just because they were, say, Japanese? And how about the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Jews, Mennonite pacifists, Moslems? Do any of them have any reason to be nervous about government demands for information?
Now, I am NOT suggesting that the government is planning a pogrom. I’m simply saying that it isn’t hard to understand the reluctance of some Canadians to share personal information with government agencies, and by the way, to complain through official channels. –Though Stats-Can is well aware that many people object to the form and process, they keep saying they’ve had very few official complaints. I wonder if they’ve ever thought of doing a survey to determine why that is.– And it seems to me that threatening to fine and/or imprison such people is unlikely to reassure them. Having never been seriously abused by government, I’m not personally concerned about my privacy in this area. But I choose to stand in solidarity with those who are concerned.
PS: I just read that former Stats-Can chief statistician, Munir Sheikh, testified to a House of Commons committee today that his only concern was that the quality of the data obtained from a voluntary census form would be lower than a mandatory survey. Well of course; that’s his department. Coercion, however, is the government’s concern, and it’s always encouraging when someone in Ottawa actually suggest we should dial it back a little.