When the Province of Quebec first
floated the idea of banning from the public service “conspicuous” religious symbols (large crosses, turbans, hijabs, kippahs,
etc.) the predictable reaction focused on individual human rights. These
concerns are legitimate, but there is another concern that’s receiving less
attention than it deserves. What happens to a society when it systematically
excludes portions of the population from full public participation?
This
banning will have little effect on Christians who, generally speaking, are not obliged
to wear “conspicuous religious symbols”. Monks and Nuns
dress in habits, and priests in clerical collars, but these symbols have become
optional. Most Christian clerics, and
almost all Christian lay people are free to dress in “secular” garb. The
few exceptions – Amish Mennonites and Hutterites are the only ones that come
readily to mind – are expressions of their own desire to stand apart. So this ban will
effectively exclude only non-Christians.
For a practicing Sikh, an
orthodox Jew, a committed Muslim, these symbols are not optional. They are required
expressions of their devotion. Excluding these symbols will exclude these
people, not just from working in a given milieux, but from participation. Why
would a Muslim mother want to send her child to a school where she would not be
welcome to teach? Why would a Sikh father wish take his child to a clinic where
he would not be welcome to work?
When we see a turban-wearing Sikh
teaching in a school, or working in a government office, we don’t see a school
system or government promoting religion, but a religiously committed citizen being
included in the life of the community. And when we see this we recognize that the community is larger than our community. We see ourselves as part
of a province, a nation, a state.
When a province, nation or state practices
exclusionary politics, it invites disaster. It encourages bigotry and prejudice
(suspicion of the other). It disrupts social cohesion and systematically fosters
fragmentation, rivalry and misunderstanding. As a non-Quebecois I realize that Quebec
may have reasons for doing this that I can’t understand, but I still wonder if
they really see what they are doing.
As a Sovereignist, of course, I remain confident that the Quebecois can work all
this out. They are as smart in their peculiar way as we are in ours. And, if
they do happen to screw it up, the Rest of Canada will gain the benefit of a
powerful experiment in social engineering, not to mention an influx of very
capable Quebec refugees.